<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://britishinside.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Is it still duplicate content with &amp;quot;noindex&amp;quot;?</title><link>http://britishinside.com/archive/2007/10/08/Is-it-still-duplicate-content-with-_2200_noindex_22003F00_.aspx</link><description>A good few years ago I started another company to run some local city websites . At one point I had created a few thousand city sites and was making some decent coin from selling ads to local businesses. The idea didn&amp;#39;t scale unfortunately - although</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 (Build: 60809.935)</generator><item><title>re: Is it still duplicate content with &amp;quot;noindex&amp;quot;?</title><link>http://britishinside.com/archive/2007/10/08/Is-it-still-duplicate-content-with-_2200_noindex_22003F00_.aspx#15049</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 05:02:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6c0ed236-b916-4a20-a8ea-4a10abe198d6:15049</guid><dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator><description>If you tell bots to not index secondary copies then you should be fine. It's always possible to get penalized for something else though, most recent worry has been suspected penalties for selling links for example.</description></item></channel></rss>